De haut en bas, de haut en bas

34

Défi:

Avec une entrée entière positive n , créez un vecteur qui suit ce modèle:

0  1  0 -1 -2 -1  0  1  2  3  2  1  0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -3 -2 -1 ... ±(n-1) ±n

Ou, expliqué avec des mots: le vecteur commence à 0, et incrémente 1jusqu'à atteindre le plus petit entier positif impair ne faisant pas partie de la séquence, puis il décrémente jusqu'à ce qu'il atteigne le plus petit (même en entier) entier négatif qui n'est pas ne fait pas partie de la séquence. Il continue ainsi jusqu'à ce quen soit atteint. La séquence se terminera sur positif nsi nest impair et négatif nsi nest pair.

Le format de sortie est flexible.

Cas de test:

n = 1
0  1
-----------
n = 2
0  1  0 -1 -2
-----------
n = 3
0  1  0 -1 -2 -1  0  1  2  3
-----------
n = 4
0  1  0 -1 -2 -1  0  1  2  3  2  1  0 -1 -2 -3 -4
-----------
n = 5
0  1  0 -1 -2 -1  0  1  2  3  2  1  0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -3 -2 -1  0  1  2  3  4  5

Vous pouvez choisir de prendre le n indexé à zéro. n = 1donnerait alors 0 1 0 -1 -2.

C'est du , donc le code le plus court dans chaque langue gagne! Les explications sont encouragées comme toujours!

Stewie Griffin
la source
2
Relevant: OEIS A196199.
Mr. Xcoder

Réponses:

10

R, 58 54 50 48 43 bytes

-2 bytes thanks to MickyT

function(n)diffinv(rep(1:n%%2*2-1,1:n*2-1))

Try it online!

function(n)
 diffinv(                           # take cumulative sum, starting at 0 of
             1:n%%2*2-1,            # a vector of alternating 1,-1
         rep(                       # repeated
                        1:n*2-1))   # 1, 3, 5, etc. times

Giuseppe
la source
8

Perl 6,  60  26 bytes

{flat {((1,-*...*)ZX*(-$++...0...$++)xx$_)}(),$_*($_%2||-1)}

Try it

{[...] (-1,-*...*)Z*0..$_}

Try it

Expanded:

{  # bare block lambda with implicit parameter $_

  [...]  # reduce using &infix:«...» (sequence generator)

          ( -1, -* ... * ) # (-1, 1, -1, 1 ... *)

      Z*                   # zip multiplied with

          0 .. $_          # range up to and including input
}

(-1,-*...*)Z*0..$_ generates the sequence 0 1 -2 3 -4 5

Brad Gilbert b2gills
la source
7

Python 2, 69 57 56 bytes

f=lambda n:[0][n:]or f(n-1)+range(-n,n+1)[::n%2*2-1][2:]

Try it online!

For each n up to the input the range(-n,n) (inclusive) is calculated, inverted when n is an even number, has the fist two numbers (after the inversion) removed, and then appended to the output.

Rod
la source
7

05AB1E, 9 7 bytes

Saved 2 bytes thanks to @Emigna

Ýā®sm*Ÿ

Try it online!

My first 05AB1E answer (I think), so I may be missing some tricks...

Explanation

Ý         # push range [0 ... n]   stack: [[0 ... n]]
 ā        # push range [1 ... len(prev)]  [[0 ... n], [1 ... n+1]]
  ®       # push value of register        [[0 ... n], [1 ... n+1], -1]
   s      # swap top two values           [[0 ... n], -1, [1 ... n+1]]
    m     # power                         [[0 ... n], [-1, 1, -1, 1, ...]]
     *    # multiply                      [[0, 1, -2, 3, -4, 5, ...]]
      Ÿ   # range interpolation           [[0, 1, 0, -1, -2, -1, ...]]

I have to thank @Dennis for the original usage of Ÿ, otherwise I may not probably would never have known about it...

ETHproductions
la source
Nice :)! I got ÝεDÈi®*}}Ÿ without checking, ā®sm is crazy smart haha.
Magic Octopus Urn
6

05AB1E, 15 14 bytes

ÝDÉ·<*Ý€û˜ÔsF¨

Try it online!

Explanation

Ý                # push range [0 ... n]
 D               # duplicate
  É·<            # (x % 2 == 1)*2-1 for each
     *           # multiply
      Ý          # range [0 ... a] for each
       €û        # palendromize each
         ˜       # flatten
          Ô      # connected uniqueified
           sF¨   # remove the last n elements
Emigna
la source
6

JavaScript (ES6), 56 bytes

f=(n,b=d=1,k=0)=>[k,...k-d*n?f(n,k-b?b:(d=-d)-b,k+d):[]]

Try it online!

Commented

f = (               // f = recursive function taking:
  n,                //   n = input
  b =               //   b = boundary value, initialized to 1
  d = 1,            //   d = current direction, initialized to 1
  k = 0             //   k = current sequence value, initialized to 0
) =>                //
  [                 // update the sequence:
    k,              //   append the current value
    ...k - d * n ?  //   if |k| is not equal to |n|:
      f(            //     append the (spread) result of a recursive call:
        n,          //       use the original input
        k - b ?     //       if k has not reached the boundary value:
          b         //         leave b unchanged
        :           //       else:
          (d = -d)  //         reverse the direction
          - b,      //         and use a boundary of higher amplitude and opposite sign
        k + d       //       update k
      )             //     end of recursive call
    :               //   else:
      []            //     stop recursion and append nothing
  ]                 // end of sequence update
Arnauld
la source
6

Haskell, 43 bytes

f n=scanl(-)0[(-1)^k|k<-[1..n],_<-[2..2*k]]

Try it online!

Computes the negated cumulative sums of the list [(-1)^k|k<-[1..n],_<-[2..2*k]], which is the first n rows of

[-1,
 +1, +1, +1,
 -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
 +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1
Lynn
la source
6

Jelly, 11 9 bytes

²Ḷƽ-*0;Ä

Try it online!

How it works

²Ḷƽ-*0;Ä  Main link. Argument: n

²          Square; yield n².
 Ḷ         Unlength; yield [0, ..., n²-1].
  ƽ       Take the integer square root of each k in the range.
    -*     Compute (-1)**r for each integer square root r.
      0;   Prepend a zero.
        Ä  Accumulate; take the sums of all prefixes.
Dennis
la source
6

Haskell, 48 42 bytes

f n=0:[(-1)^i*x|i<-[0..n-1],x<-[1-i..i+1]]

Try it online!

Thanks to Οurous for -1 byte

Even though it's kind of obvious in hindsight, it took me a while to arrive at (-1)^i*x which is x when i is even and -x when i is odd. Previous iterations where:

(-1)^i*x
x-2*mod i 2*x
(-1)^mod i 2*x
[x,-x]!!mod i 2
(1-sum[2|odd i])*x
Laikoni
la source
1
You can save a byte by using 1-i instead of -i+1 in the .. expression.
Οurous
4

C# (.NET Core), 300 167 bytes

I've never done any of these before, but this one seemed fun. I see why people use those "golfing" languages as 167 seems way higher than some of the other answers. But, you gotta go with what you know.

static int[] f(int n){if (n==1) return new int[]{0,1};var a=f(n-1);return a.Concat(a.Skip(a.Length-(n-1)*2).Select(x=>-x)).Concat(new int[]{(n%2)!=0?n:-n}).ToArray();}

Try it online!

// Recursive Worker Function
static public int[] f( int n )
{
    // Start with the simple case
    if ( n == 1 ) return new int[]{0,1};

    // Recusively build off of that
    var a = f(n-1);

    // To be added at the end
    int[] b = { (n%2) !=0 ? n : -n };

    // Skip some based on length
    int s = a.Length - (n-1)*2;

    // With the rest, multiply by -1 and then append to the end
    // And append the part
    return a.Concat( a.Skip(s).Select( x => -x ) ).Concat( b ).ToArray();
}
Darrin Cullop
la source
1
You can make this a lot shorter if you only count the using statements and the function. This is allowed by default unless the challenge specifies it must be a full program (even if it did, you could shorten the containing class name).
Οurous
Thank you! Thanks to your suggestion, I figured out the meaning of the "header" and "footer" sections of the TIO site. That cut my submission size in half!
Darrin Cullop
2
Welcome to PPCG! (this looks like your first post.) Don't worry about the other languages, just try to be as good as possible in your language. / Tips: Remove unnecessary spaces. In C# you can remove all spaces surrounding symbols ([](){};.) (n-1)*2 is just 2*n-2 and with some rearrangement you can remove the parentheses there.
user202729
Besides, != has precedence less than % so you can remove a pair of parens. And you can use >0 instead of `!=0, saves a byte.
user202729
1
Also from me: welcome to PPCG! Tips for golfing in C# and Tips for golfing in all languages might be interesting to read through. :) As for some golfing tips: static int[] f(int n) can become f=n=> by using a (recursive) lambda, and (n-1)*2 can become ~-n*2 to save on the parenthesis. I got it down to 155 (137 + 18) bytes: Try it online. The 18 bytes are for using System.Linq;, because required imports are mandatory for the byte-count. Enjoy your stay!
Kevin Cruijssen
4

J, 25 bytes

-5 bytes thanks to FrownyFrog!

>:@*:$i.;@(<@i:@*_1&^)@,]

Try it online!

J, 30 bytes

>:@*:{.;@([:(i:@*_1&^)&.>i.,])

Explanation:

i.,] creates list 0..n

&.> for each number in the list execute the verb in (...) and box the result (I need boxing because the results have different length)

[:( _1&^) find -1 to the ith power (-1 or 1)

i:@* make a list -n..n or n..-n, depending on the sign of the above

;@ unbox

>:@*: find n^2 + 1

}. and take so many numbers from the list

Try it online!

Galen Ivanov
la source
1
would you consider writing the same code as a zero based n version? e.g *:{.;@([:(i:@*_1&^)&.>i.) .. the specification allows that
jayprich
"n = 1 would then give 0 1 0 -1 -2"
FrownyFrog
@FrownyFrog - Hmm, I didn't check it. I reverted to my first solution. Thank you for the observation!
Galen Ivanov
1
25 Use $ for the cut-off, no need for &.> because * is rank-0.
FrownyFrog
3

Python 2, 65 56 bytes

r=k=0;exec'print r;r+=1-k**.5//1%2*2;k+=1;'*-~input()**2

The output format is a bit ugly. :/

Try it online!

Dennis
la source
3

Java 8, 85 83 79 bytes

n->{for(int p=0,i=0;i<=n*n;p+=1-(int)Math.sqrt(i++)%2*2)System.out.println(p);}

-6 bytes thanks to @OlivierGrégoire.

Try it online.

Explanation:

n->{                            // Method with integer parameter and no return-type
  for(int p=0,                  //  Set both `p` to 0
      i=0;i<=n*n;               //  Loop `i` in the range [0, `n*n`]
      p+=                       //    After every iteration, increase `p` by:
         1-                     //     1, minus:
           (int)Math.sqrt(i++)  //     The square-root of `i`, truncated to its integer
           %2*2)                //     Modulo 2, and multiplied by 2
     System.out.println(p);}    //   Print integer `p` with a trailing new-line
Kevin Cruijssen
la source
Nice approach. I was working on such approach right now, to improve my answer, but you beat me to it (despite your meeting), well done! ;-)
Olivier Grégoire
1
83 bytes (I just removed j).
Olivier Grégoire
1
79 bytes: I made i go up instead of down to remove a redundant n*n.
Olivier Grégoire
Hi. Writing this to inform me you that I basically ripped off your answer. (port to JavaScript). Hope it's ok
Muhammad Salman
@MuhammadSalman Sure, np. I port answers from others pretty often as well. :) As long as the original answer is mentioned, like you did, it's all fine by me.
Kevin Cruijssen
3

R, 48 46 42 bytes

for(i in 1:scan())F=c(F,-(-1)^i*(2-i):i);F

Try it online!

A port of the Ruby answer by Kirill L. - and saved 6 bytes thanks to the same Kirill L.! Now shorter than Giuseppe's solution ;)

A port of this Octave answer by Luis Mendo using approx is less golfy. n=n^2+1 can be replaced by ,,n^2+1; or by 0:n^2+1(positional argument xout) for the same byte count :

R, 56 bytes

f=function(n)approx((0:n)^2+1,-(-1)^(0:n)*0:n,n=n^2+1)$y

Try it online!

JayCe
la source
I think approx will work here in a similar manner to Luis Mendo's Octave solution as well.
Giuseppe
@Giuseppe Thanks! It does work though it's longer. I've learned diffinv and approx from this question...
JayCe
Although I also don't know a golfier way to do -1 power (in R ~ doesn't work as a complement operator :(), you can still save another 2 bytes by switching to a full program.
Kirill L.
...and since it is a full program we can also use and spoil a predefined built-in: 42 bytes - finally, shorter than Giuseppe's!
Kirill L.
3

APL (Dyalog Unicode), 17 bytes

+\01*⍳(/⍨)1+2×⍳

Try it online!

Golfed 2 bytes thanks to @FrownyFrog by converting to a train. See the older answer and its explanation below.


APL (Dyalog Unicode), 19 bytes

+\0,∊⊢∘-\⍴1¨1+2×⍳⎕

Try it online!

(Uses ⎕IO←0)

My first approach was to construct multiple ranges and concatenate them together, this easily went over 30 bytes. Then I started analysing the sequence

      +\⍣¯10  1  0 ¯1 ¯2 ¯1  0  1  2  3  2  1  0 ¯1 ¯2 ¯3 ¯4
0 1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 1 1 1 1 1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1

+\⍣¯1 denotes the inverse cumulative sum

There is a repeating pattern of 1s and ¯1s, where the length of each consecutive sequence of 1s or ¯1s is 1+2×n. And each subsequence alternates between 1 and ¯1. What I can do now is to create the 1s and ¯1s list, and then scan by +

      4  creates range 0..4
0 1 2 3
      2×⍳4
0 2 4 6
      1+2×⍳4
1 3 5 7
      ⍴∘1¨1+2×⍳4  for-each create that many 1s
┌─┬─────┬─────────┬─────────────┐
11 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1
└─┴─────┴─────────┴─────────────┘
      ⊢∘-\⍴1¨1+2×⍳4  alternate signs
┌─┬────────┬─────────┬────────────────────┐
1│¯1 ¯1 ¯11 1 1 1 1│¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1
└─┴────────┴─────────┴────────────────────┘
      ∊⊢∘-\⍴1¨1+2×⍳4  flatten
1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 1 1 1 1 1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1
      0,∊⊢∘-\⍴1¨1+2×⍳4
0 1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 1 1 1 1 1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1 ¯1
      +\0,∊⊢∘-\⍴1¨1+2×⍳4  cumulative sum
0 1 0 ¯1 ¯2 ¯1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 ¯1 ¯2 ¯3 ¯4
Kritixi Lithos
la source
Checking other answers now, I see many also use the +\ method, but generate the sequence of 1s and ¯1s with ¯1*⌊.5*⍨×⍨⍳ which happens to be at least 3 bytes shorter.
Kritixi Lithos
+\0,¯1*⍳(/⍨)1+2×⍳ is 17
FrownyFrog
I knew my solution felt long
Zacharý
2

Haskell, 47 bytes

(#0)
m#n|m>n=[-n..n]++map(0-)(m#(n+1))|1>0=[-m]

Try it online!

user1472751
la source
2

Java (JDK 10), 98 bytes

n->{var s="0";for(int i=0,r=0,d=1;i++<n;s+=" "+r,d=-d)for(r+=d;r!=i&r!=-i;r+=d)s+=" "+r;return s;}

Try it online!

Olivier Grégoire
la source
Ah, while I was in my meeting you sneaked in an answer before me.. ;) Will leave mine as well through, because we use a completely different approach. +1 either way.
Kevin Cruijssen
2

MATL, 17 15 bytes

-2 bytes thanks to Luis Mendo!

0i:oEqG:EqY"Ysh

Try it online!

Explanation for n=3:

0		% push 0
 i:		% read input as integer, push range
		% stack: [0, [1 2 3]]
   o		% modulo 2, stack: [0, [1 0 1]]
    Eq		% double and decrement, stack: [0, [1 -1 1]]
      G:	% push input and range again
		% stack: [0, [1 -1 1], [1 2 3]]
        Eq	% double and decrement,
		% stack: [0, [1 -1 1], [1 3 5]]
	  Y"	% run-length decoding
		% stack: [0, [1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1 1]]
	    Ys	% cumulative sum
		% stack: [0, [1  0 -1 -2 -1  0  1  2  3]]
	      h	% horizontally concatenate
		% end of program, automatically print the stack
Giuseppe
la source
2

Ruby, 52 47 bytes

f=->n{n<1?[0]:f[n-1]+(2-n..n).map{|x|-~0**n*x}}

Try it online!

Below is the original 52-byte version with an explanation:

f=->n{n<1?[0]:f[n-1]+[(r=*2-n..n).map(&:-@),r][n%2]}

Try it online!

Walkthrough

f=->n{           #Recursive approach
 n<1?[0]         #Init with 0 if n=0
 :f[n-1]         #else make a recursive call
 +               #and append an array of numbers
 [(r=*2-n..n)    #Init r as splatted range from 2-n to n
 .map(&:-@)      #"-@" is unary minus, so this a fancy way to do map{|x|-x} for -1 byte
                 #For even n use this negated r, e.g. for n=4: [2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4]
 ,r]             #For odd n use r directly, e.g. for n=3: [-1, 0, 1, 2, 3]
 [n%2]           #Odd/even selector
}
Kirill L.
la source
I don't know Ruby - can you explain what this does especially the map(&:-@) portion?
JayCe
@JayCe Added an explanation. Basically, this is just negation, what in R would be simply -r.
Kirill L.
Thanks for the explanation - it helped me port this to R.
JayCe
2

Prolog (SWI), 113 bytes

0-I-[0|I].
N-[H|T]-R:-N is -H*(-1)^N,A is N-1,A-[H|T]-R;I is H-(-1)^N,N-[I|[H|T]]-R.
N-O:-X is -N*(-1)^N,N-[X]-O.

Try it online!

ASCII-only
la source
1

Python 3, 83 bytes

def c(n):print([(-1)**j*(abs(j-i)-j)for j in range(n+1)for i in range(2*j)][:-n+1])
bobrobbob
la source
1

Charcoal, 19 bytes

F⊕NI×∨﹪ι²±¹…·∧ι⁻²ιι

Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:

  N                 Input as a number
 ⊕                  Increment
F                   Loop over implicit range
                ²   Literal 2
                 ι  Current index
               ⁻    Subtract
              ι     Current index
             ∧      Logical And
                  ι Current index
           …·       Inclusive range
       ι            Current index
        ²           Literal 2
      ﹪             Modulo
          ¹         Literal 1
         ±          Negate
     ∨              Logical Or
    ×               Multiply
   I                Cast to string and implicitly print

Alternative explanation:

F⊕N

Loop over the integers from 0 to the input inclusive.

Cast the results to string before printing.

×∨﹪ι²±¹

Negate alternate sets of results.

…·∧ι⁻²ιι

Form a list from the previous index to the current index, excluding the previous index.

Neil
la source
1

Jelly,  11  12 bytes

Bah, I thought I had 11 wih _2+ỊrN)N;¥/

_2+ỊrN×-*$)Ẏ

Try it online!

How?

_2+ỊrN×-*$)Ẏ - Main Link: n           e.g. 4
          )  - for x in [1...n]:           1       2          3               4
_2           -   subtract 2 from x        -1       0          1               2
   Ị         -   is x insignificant?       1       0          0               0
  +          -   add                       0       0          1               2
     N       -   negate x                 -1      -2         -3              -4
    r        -   inclusive range          [0,-1]  [0,-1,-2]  [1,0,-1,-2,-3]  [2,1,0,-1,-2,-3,-4]
         $   -   last two links as a monad:
       -     -     minus one              -1      -1         -1              -1
        *    -     raised to the power x  -1       1         -1               1
      ×      -   multiply                 [0,1]   [0,-1,-2]  [-1,0,1,2,3]    [2,1,0,-1,-2,-3,-4]
           Ẏ - tighten                    [0,1,0,-1,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-3,-4]
Jonathan Allan
la source
1

Scala, 119 Bytes

def a(n: Int)={lazy val s:Stream[Int]=0#::Stream.from(0).map{x=>s(x)+1 -2*(Math.sqrt(x).toInt%2)}
s.take(n*n+1).toList}

Ungolfed:

def a(n: Int)={
  lazy val s:Stream[Int]= 0#::Stream.from(0).map //Give the starting point and indexing scheme
  {
    x=>
    {
      val sign = 1-2*(Math.sqrt(x).toInt%2) //Determine whether we are adding or subtracting at the current index
      s(x)+sign
    }
  }
  s.take(n*n+1).toList //Take the desired values
}

This can probably be golfed much better, but I wanted a solution utilizing lazy Streams.

Ethan
la source
1

Stacked, 44 bytes

[~>0\:2%\#,2*1-tr[...rep]flatmap,$sumonpref]

Try it online! It's been a while since I programmed in Stacked, but I think I still got it.

Alternatives

73 bytes: [0\|>:2%tmo*2 infixes[:...|>\rev...|>rev#,$#'sortby 1#behead]flatmap 0\,]

This goes with the "ranges from generated indices" approach used in my Attache answer. This proved to be pretty long, since Stacked has no builtin for reversed ranges nor collapsing. (That's what :...|>\rev...|>rev#,$#'sortby 1#behead does.)

53 bytes: [0\|>:2%tmo _\tpo#,tr[...rep]flatmap 0\,inits$summap]

...so I decided to go for an approach which instead finds the cumulative sum (inits$summap) over 1 and -1 repeated by the odd integers, as in the R answer.

46 bytes: [~>0\:2%\#,2*1-tr[...rep]flatmap,inits$summap]

...but I realized that the negative integers and the odd integers could be made in one go, by multiplying both generated arrays (the mod 2 values of the range and the range itself) by 2 then subtracting 1. This gives alternating 1s and -1s for the first range and the odd integers for the second!

44 bytes: [~>0\:2%\#,2*1-tr[...rep]flatmap,$sumonpref]

... and then I remembered I had a builtin for mapping prefixes. ^-^

Conor O'Brien
la source
1

Julia 0.6, 44 bytes

n->[(i%2*2-1)*[0:i;(n>i)*~-i:-1:1]for i=1:n]

Try it online!

Since OP mentions "the output format is flexible", this prints an array of sub arrays, eg. U(3) => [[0, 1], [0, -1, -2, -1], [0, 1, 2, 3]].

i%2*2-1 decides the sign of the current subarray - negative for even numbers, positive for odd.

[0:i;(n>i)*~-i:-1:1] is in two parts. 0:i is straightforward, the range of values from 0 to the current i. In the next part, ~-i:-1:1 is the descending range from i-1 to 1. But we want to append this only if we're not yet at the final value, so multiply the upper end of the range by (n>i) so that when n==i, the range will be 0:-1:1 which ends up empty (so the array stops at n correctly).


And here's a version that can support random access - the inner lambda here returns the i'th term of the sequence without having to have stored any of the terms before it. This one gives the output as a single neat array too.

49 47 bytes

n->map(i->((m=isqrt(i))%2*2-1)*(m-i+m^2),0:n^2)

Try it online!

sundar - Reinstate Monica
la source